The Testiment 2004:
The bio - genesis of male aggressive behavior is inextricably linked to our delivery " life's " system,
and emotional instincts in which its heterosexual emotional support structures are gentle. This represents
our innate physical , and pyschological drives to produce children This is the socio-genesis of our on going constuction
of human civilizatiuons. That progessive civilizations are initiated circumstances of the socio-cultural and socio-political
extensions of FATHERHOODS. Note the plural.
Thus males are fully aware of the critical differences between when we are hurting
in contrast to being gentle. Moreover, our emotional subconscious, the innate, of our sexuality is gentle oriented,
though the physiological drive component is totally aggressive. When they are both active at the sameting
provides the critical emotional-pyschological support structures and linkages to achieve complete balance during the act of
sexual union. Thus in the consenting conditions of that sexual union, the experience is magnified-thus is MORE
sexually desired by mainstream males.
The emotional release after this specific experience is awsome. Not with standing, thereof, the experience
in that union, for us, is total collaboration with our innate instincts of gentleness in life's experience-within the life
giving bio-force of our own bodies. Though the expression ' Wet and Wild is often miss-used, none - the - less to actual
physical experience of union is the most gentle exerience a man can ever have in our lives. The expected ends of which
is " our "conformation of the reality, procreation, and is rooted in our collective physical experience, and not with
standing, the socio-genetic results the ends of union, CHILDREN.
It is the emotional and sexual means in which the recognized human development of male innate
sexaul drives, and their emotional responses, which ultimately prepares us for both fatherhood, The enjoyment therein,
and the necessary means to create supportive civilizations. This reflects the known conscious behaviorism of two
thirds of the male population, who and what we are. Thus, we are fully conscious of its developmental
aspects to our roles towards healthy living heterosexuality; and its physical and emotional sexual patholgoies,
as well as their extricable linkages to the male innate. The ends of which is the anthrocultural social manisfestation
of " fatherhood". This also, again, is the socio - genesis of civilization.
The scope of the present ethos:
In the efforts to achieve sexual equalities ( Please, agin note the plural. ), manisfestly, women looked
upon power as the means to be applied to their ends. Morerover, their view of the male historic roles and
perceptions of power, then, as it does in present times, has skewed present day perceptions about male sexual behaviorisms
( within the resulting neuroses, often those neuroses cause by the struggle for power ). What has been happening
is the infra-female culture has, unaware, as result of power struggle related neuroses, have also been implacing a growing
socio-sexual schism between males and females. At times not fully aware that their neuroses exists.
The primary causes are the neurotic superstitions of the territoriality
ends of males historically achieving power. What the relevant, and there are considerable resource
avenues to explore this, historic evidence of human behavior then indicates, now ironically applys to both males
This is centered on the socio-sexual perceptions of the struggle for power of how it underminded
the necessity of a clearity of focus in viewing accurately, the false superstitions it is now creating. Their
underlinning or hidden socio-sexual neuroses are at times a complete socio-cultural subterfuge towards overall social
and sexual male behavioralisms in general.
This historic on-going process has further underminded civilization role to focus
on the crucial present evidence of linkage between our delivery system and the emotional constructs of male personalities
. And to provide at the sametime the centrality of healthy hetero-sexual role functions, as a result. This
is the central cause and effects in which we, males, are increasingly becoming vulnerable to sexual slander and giving
rise to our own internal neuroses towards women as a result.
What this, as a result of not coming to terms to these issues, their, the leadership
of the infra-female culture. in the histoic views of the means and struggle to achieve sexual equality. many did
not foresee the crucial needs or aspects for self-policing to gurantee the success of the feminist agenda. Further
on their part, as female leaders' have had a considerable part in the sociosexual responsiabilities of accidently
triggering the resulting socio-political schism of variois and at times complex male - female relationships involved.
This has also initiated a growing disunity within the infra-female culture. Secondary
affects is that they have not comprehended it's static affects on delaying male maturity at the sametime
to those who are born after 1967. Thus with increasing, and alarming statistics males are not going
to marry as a result. Or how this has also underminding their end goals ( again, note the plural ) of
It is within the present unknown, and thus to be the here-in forementioned, ' The Testiment,
' sexual equality begins when both male and female components of human society finds commonalities in
self-policing attitudes within their respected infra-sexual cultures. This means, in the mean time, and there
from it's bio-genetic innate forces, the critical " positive "connection involved between, and " for " both sexes. The
individual workings of which are the real connections, and not superstitions of the other. The focus of which are between
the innate drives which produces aggressive behaviorism, primarily our delivery system, along too, their emotional expectations,
and balance assurances within their innate support structures, the " id revealed " and it's further impact of operating
dynamics in the ends of sexual union.
What is still not clearly comprehended within the infra - female culture, are the innate dynamics of
realtionships that were being altered during their historic acculturalization of power, and how some aspects of power negatively
impacting stable infra-female, female to male realtionships and the consequence of creating sociocultural trauma
among their, our children. This centers on territoriality.
Brute Force ( A Dsyfunction Comprehended ):
Before the 19th Century: What was really happening, is that as a result of males once acquiring
sexual maturity, IE. fatherhood, his - our historic " X " factor in which other males have been able to exploit
as a socioeconomic and sociopolitical weakness to be used to gain dominance through income, and resource intimitation, or
varoius acts of brute force. War! The overall, intent to motive, was to emasculate, as well as interject the growing dependency
of civilization's ethos on either economic and /or military power as another means to gain dominance. This.
the " X " factor, was also the component in which pro - democratic males had of the 19th century and thus, as a
result,comprehended the importance of why feminism at that time to be important. The critical link, was in discovery
of the issues that women had, and the realistic impact upon the American civilization once their goals of sexual equality
came about. The opperating component, was the same innate factors which creates the socio-cultural practice of fatherhood.
Territoriality and political controls are the significant processes. and why massive numbers of families
were forced to surcumed and then were herded, and the causual establishment of slavery came as a result during the 16th
Abuse and Vulnerabilities:
In the pursuit for power to achieve sexual equality, the real dynamics of power, and without any evidence
of self-policing thereof, traditional female co-relationships were exploited by the here before mentioned 1/3 women
to screen, sebterfuge, ( hide behind lables or false flaggs ) , their, the 1/27, intent were
to abuse males, and there after other women. The subterfuge curtain of the 1990s was then drawn. Relationships are
becoming the means by which a third of this minoirty female community further exploits other females by the socio-cultural
implied superstition towards male innate personality constructs. Thus a political process of having power over
other women have been established as one of the sought-after results within various groupings.
Though the target, publically, are initially males, the real
ntended target is power over other other women.
Since the mid - 1990s, this with increase frequency is damaging, their, the infra - female culture internal
undrstandings, while falsifying at the sametime, under ruse of superstitions, male extricable linkages between
aggressive systems of drives and their, our, emnotional support underpinnings. The ruse of
this power struggle is to cut off the main resource of the primary male emotional support underpinning, relationships
with women. What must be made clear is their, the small core of this group of these women,
their socio-political interests, are their ends of which is to achieve social, sexual, political and spiritual territorialities
slices of power. The signature evidence of which is found in females purchasing
male on male sexual videos [ AdamEve covert interviews ] , and the recent increasing socio-sexual phenonmena of sociopolitical
disassociations with other women who have sons, women sexually attacking other women, as well as violence
" The additional associative core of dysfunctional
sociopolitical tendency is initiated when Lesbians are feared by these women - for it is the Lesbian Communities who
have the pychic established skills and ability to unvail who these women are. "
In essence linking power with esculating forms of abuse under the cloak of traditional female network
relationships relations as the means, the growing internal socio-sexual cancer of the infra-female culture to destroy their
The single factor why other women should be ever more concern, is that the behavior, emphasized
here, indicates the arch type female which sexually, and/or humiliates other women. ( This in a covert interview
with pornography films AdamEve is the prime marketing consideration factor behind recent market trends in their industry,
as well as the enlarging customer base of females purchasing male on male sex videos. January 2001 )
Lost of Sexual Equality:
Cautionary note; therewithin, is that in the historic acculturalization to acquire the means of power from
which to accomblish the ends of sexual equality, it has produced a subculture of " the struggle " which has negated the necessary
focus towards self-policing, while at the sametime, unaware, producing the poliferation of superstitions
ground work about male sexuality; this is the cause of the growing socio-sexual schisms.
The affect target to emasculated is the male delivery system component!
Moreover, and saddly, it is the overall impact, in essence, upon the needed developing consciousnees of
feminism which could in the end, if not clearly understood now, cause the lost of female sexual
equality. It is within the dynamics of power and how power is governed, and self-policed, from which needed
new behaviors are now needed to preserve the accomblishments of female sexual equality.
It is the connection, as it must be, also, cautioned, between power, and certainly not in all instance,
and the anthromorphisms of territoriality on " how " it affects both sexes together in a single focus; as this is also, involves
the establishment of the correct perception of the opperating pathologies within sexual harrassment, rape, torture, and murder,
not to mentioned, within specific historic instances, war.
A further focus of who we are as males:
Lastly, it is upon this plaform, and its future direction of discovery, that self-realization of fully comprehending
the sexuality of males, by the female infra-culutre starts to come to honest terms of male bio-genetic sexual behavior,
and it's impact upon towards our social behavior in genreal. The wall of superstitions will be emotionally removed
as a result. That within the socio - sexual dynamics of coming thus far, females will accurately be able to view
the inner workings of the infra-male culture attempting to come to terms with our internal conflicting anthromorphic
mongynous and polyandrous instincts in establishing both social and sexual relationships.
That there exist a spearation between our delivery " X " systems and our
emotional " Y " constructs. That these X and Y components are a functional personality. That it is the function
of culture how the X and Y factor relates and are organized in the development of a healthy individual personality.
Monogyny.. Polygny..Female Icons - Environemtnal Preservancy.
Most importantly, this will give an even more accurate picture of the developmental role modeling
paradigms of " the male " perception of the healthy female specimen, as a drive subconscious icon. It's,
the icon, unknown connections in our innate intincts towards environmntal preservancy and it's further connections to
replacing the equalibrium back in that preservancy. Furthermore, in the efforts in achieveing equalities, the
critical issues of male sexual " diverse instincts " both monogyny and polygny becomes exposed as legtimate orientations
( both monogynous, and polyandrous ) within their operating human dynmics. ( Note, the connection between the male
paradigm of the female healthy role specimen model, which changes in historic cycles, and the enviornmental preservancy, lends
more emphasis on reeempowering the goodess traditons of olde. the female fulfillment of both of becoming that icon, or goddess,
and it's relationships to preservancy of the enviornment ) Thus, this " should " place more emphasis upon personal
conduct of establishing realistic human and family covenants, not with standing the additional protective needed legislation
of law, within both human social and sexual realtionships, as a resutt of society coming to terms of diverse orientations
within human sexuality. This also includes those of alternaitve orientation. That within the bio-genesis of human
civilzation neither the origins nor the ends of the innovation of civilization should not be ignored in the full development
of sexual equality; for this allows more free operating fields of research and the resulting diversity of life styles to emerge
to redress those intrernal stresses which produces human neuroses, both male and female.